(no subject)
Oct. 4th, 2005 09:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Imagine my surprise when I found out today that the saddo who is my ex is now practising as a hypnotherapist! I suppose that, as the business isn't really regulated, that any fool can do a course over a few weekends and set themselves up as a therapist. I wonder if it cures spaghetti phobias?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-05 07:45 pm (UTC)I do wonder about the regs regrading people who call themselves therapists - wasn't there an EU ruling about certain qualifications being required for people to practice under the banner of 'therapist'?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-06 06:14 am (UTC)There are so many bodies which set themselves up to offer qualifications, some even get a certain legitimacy by being accredited by certain universities, but it's still very much a self-regulated industry. You really need to tread carefully, especially when someone is messing with your head.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-07 08:20 am (UTC)Interesting thing is, I hear that "hypnotherapists" are stopping using that term, preferring to call themselves "hypnotic consultants" — it's claimed this is because the word "hypnotherapist" can be broken down to "hypno-the-rapist" with bad subconscious connotations, which sounds like bollocks to me — and the
hypnotherapisthypnotic consultant who told me that looked pretty blank when I said that psychotherapists didn't seem to have problems calling themselves that. I wonder if — cynicism in full flow here — it's simply that "hypnotic consultant" is a title which is not regulated in any way.I do find it amusing that a straightforward reading of "hypnotic consultant" would be a consultant who puts you to sleep.