Slay the Pagans????
Jul. 19th, 2005 11:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
According to what has been said on a forum I'm on another reason for the PF deciding to cancel the conference is because of a radio broadcast on Radio 4 on Sunday morning when they broadcast an excert from the Koran that urges:
"But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them"
As the area has a high Muslim population this made the PF feel unsafe and so added to the risk.
What a pile of poo.
"But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them"
As the area has a high Muslim population this made the PF feel unsafe and so added to the risk.
What a pile of poo.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-20 08:01 am (UTC)I was at the London one last year and we had thought about going to it this year. I wasn't at the Scottish one this year and I'm unlikely ever to attend any of them ever again if the present incumbents are still in control so the London one seemed attractive. I used to live in East London, know the area very well, and would quite liked to have attended.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-20 08:11 am (UTC)j xxx
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-20 08:39 am (UTC)The reason for that is simple. It's what their announcement said:
If they didn't mean that they were concerned about safety & transport in addition to the fact that speakers withdrew for the same reasons, then the PF really needs to get someone who knows what they are doing to draft their public statements.
And, as I've said elsewhere, there was the option of actually telling everyone that speakers had pulled out, appealing for replacements (frankly, I think those speakers and stalls who were too feart to go to the convention should be named).
If the PF makes an announcement like that, it is at fault. Any group which says (whether that's what they meant to say or not) that they are cancelling an event in two months because of the bombings in London almost two weeks ago deserves to be castigated. If the statement is true, they deserve it for being cowardly, if it is not true, they deserve it for being so incompetent that they look cowardly.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-20 08:46 am (UTC)I agree with that. An organisation like PF doesn't just run on money, they run on reputation too. If the conference was cancelled due to people pulling out then PF has every right to name the cancellers so future conventions, moots and fests can make up their minds whether they would be willing to risk inviting them.
I agree that the statement was badly worded, and one of the northern committee members has admitted as much. But the post on the forum about the Radio 4 statement was quoting a rumour, and to castigate PF for something they didn't say, but was attributed to them by someone random is ridiculous.
j xxx